Discrimination Against Those with AIDS :: Discrimination AIDS

Employees are being discriminated against for their infectious illnessknown as A.I.D.S. They are labeled incapable of do the tasks theypursued before they were recognized as being infected. The confidentiality ofan employee is a private matter and very individual(prenominal). There aremany differentkinds of prejudice but not angio tensin converting enzyme as deadly as A.I.D.S Discrimination. Theemotional trauma and future ofemployment play a giant role in the inflicted.Health policies through job-related fields must(prenominal) learn to recognize that likeother illnesses, A.I.D.S does not forbid an employee of carry throughing his or herduties. It is the most altering form of discrimination because of the fact thatevery conviction a person finds out they are positive, the opinions of those whosurround them are likely to change. The working class is the most susceptible tothis form of discrimination. The every day environment of an employee withA.I.D.S is also the work grounds for someone who isntinfected with A.I.D.S.A.I.D.S Discrimination in a job-related atmosphere is due to lack of educationand sensitivity.The infection of HIV does not undertake an employeesefficiency fromsatisfactory to intolerable. An employee should not be denied employment orpromotion if they are not flawed by HIV. Some employees are not stripped oftheir capacities to perform even though they are infected with HIV(Lewy 2). Whyshould the employee health benefits be altered because of the nature of thedisease. The majority of employee policies offered cover catastrophic illnesswith only ten percent covering A.I.D.S. One particular policy states thatpeople do not become infected through usual behavior in a working environment.This illustrates that A.I.D.S patients are protected under disability law andare entitled to the same medical benefits (Karr A1). Policies must be issued toprotect the inflicted. A part of Health and Human Services review boardhas ruled discrimination against someone whos HIV-positive is illegal (Kolasa63). Where does it say that unless the infected is under employment? The main amour to understand is that it doesnt. Eileen Kolasa reminds us of a law of directmeaning HIV is a handicap protected under federal law (66). The American evaluator system is what decides the fate of the infected. The challenge ofbringing an A.I.D.S discrimination case in court has become very common in theUnited States. Such actions ca-ca been victorious and have helped pass revisedDisability Acts which applies to all diseases (Annas 592).Even though the infected are defended under law, it still violates apersons human rights of personal health secrecy. This discrimination has notreceived attention as aform of human-rights violation. The government and courtsystems have helped essentially, but discrimination also affects medical care.